Find me the best intel processor :D

As the title says

also which motherboard is better
1)
http://www.ebuyer.com/363671-asus-sabertooth-z77-socket-1155-hdmi-displayport-8-channel-audio-atx-motherboard-sabertooth-z77

2)
http://www.ebuyer.com/320432-asus-mb-p9x79-intel-x79-motherboard-atx-intel-socket-2011-for-2nd-p9x79


price doesnt matter

[Pro-C|uB] Mini-moof wrote:As the title says

also which motherboard is better
1)
http://www.ebuyer.com/363671-asus-sabertooth-z77-socket-1155-hdmi-displayport-8-channel-audio-atx-motherboard-sabertooth-z77

2)
http://www.ebuyer.com/320432-asus-mb-p9x79-intel-x79-motherboard-atx-intel-socket-2011-for-2nd-p9x79


price doesnt matter

SAbertooth cause "military class" + i5 2500k if not hard video editing 3D rendering or i7 2600k if VIdeo editing and 3D rendering.

Paradoxxx_ wrote:

[Pro-C|uB] Mini-moof wrote:As the title says

also which motherboard is better
1)
http://www.ebuyer.com/363671-asus-sabertooth-z77-socket-1155-hdmi-displayport-8-channel-audio-atx-motherboard-sabertooth-z77

2)
http://www.ebuyer.com/320432-asus-mb-p9x79-intel-x79-motherboard-atx-intel-socket-2011-for-2nd-p9x79


price doesnt matter

SAbertooth cause "military class" + i5 2500k if not hard video editing 3D rendering or i7 2600k if VIdeo editing and 3D rendering.

only the 2600k?? not the latest ones ?

SAbertooth cause "military class" + i5 2500k if not hard video editing 3D rendering or i7 2600k if VIdeo editing and 3D rendering. [/quote]
no! If your going to spend that much money,well if u do get the sabertooth make sure its Rev.2 not Rev.1.
http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/Intel_Socket_1155/Maximus_V_Formula/
this sabertooth?
http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/Intel_Socket_1155/SABERTOOTH_Z77/
ugly as fuk,but i like the lil northbridge fan.
do not get this one
http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/Intel_Socket_1155/Maximus_V_GENE/
this one is sexy
http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/Intel_Socket_1155/Maximus_V_Extreme/

OMG Mini-m00f!
this one is so leeb
http://www.asus.com/Motherboards/Intel_CPU_on_Board/AT5IONTI/

Im staying with AMD
you guys think that haveing the most exspensive crap is best?
my $800 system Is almost the same as my $2200 system
but more cores is better dont get me wrong and haveing a good intergrated sound card works wonders,but hey every one has their own opinion

p0kelotsmot wrote:Im staying with AMD
you guys think that haveing the most exspensive crap is best?
my $800 system Is almost the same as my $2200 system
but more cores is better dont get me wrong and haveing a good intergrated sound card works wonders,but hey every one has their own opinion

I wonder how you're still able to say that AMD , whichever one, is as good as intel of the same category.

Exemple : my i5 2500k stock is better than latest 6Core from AMD. And with a slightly boost @ 4.00Ghz it blows AMD Octocores series. So I let you imagine how powerfull it is when it's clocked @ 4.8Ghz or 5Ghz like it is on my Comp.

Actually, @ 4.8Ghz, it beats hands down Last intel 1366 990x even overclocked. SandyBridges are beasts.

And which ever CPU u get, you'll have to buy another CPU Cooler. I personnaly have the Scythe Ninja 3. It's a good one and let even RAMs with HUUUUUGE dissipator (who said Gskill Ripsjawx? ) fit under it. And he dissipate the heat verywell. But it's a pain in the $%^ to install.

And to mini moof : Ivy Bridge sucks. More heat, more price, same performance.

Take the Sabertooth. Take an i7 2600k if you really need it. Even myself, which does prolly more photoshop/videoediting/3Drendering than anybody here, i just took the i5 2500k.

Btw, For your information, the i5 2500k clocked to the max is better than i7 2600k clocked to the max in some situtations. As the i7 can't reach that high frequencies that i5 can. Therefore, just buy the i5.

In conclusion, take The i7 only if you got the money.

Paradoxxx_ wrote:

p0kelotsmot wrote:Im staying with AMD
you guys think that haveing the most exspensive crap is best?
my $800 system Is almost the same as my $2200 system
but more cores is better dont get me wrong and haveing a good intergrated sound card works wonders,but hey every one has their own opinion

I wonder how you're still able to say that AMD , whichever one, is as good as intel of the same category.

Exemple : my i5 2500k stock is better than latest 6Core from AMD. And with a slightly boost @ 4.00Ghz it blows AMD Octocores series. So I let you imagine how powerfull it is when it's clocked @ 4.8Ghz or 5Ghz like it is on my Comp.

Actually, @ 4.8Ghz, it beats hands down Last intel 1366 990x even overclocked. SandyBridges are beasts.

And which ever CPU u get, you'll have to buy another CPU Cooler. I personnaly have the Scythe Ninja 3. It's a good one and let even RAMs with HUUUUUGE dissipator (who said Gskill Ripsjawx? ) fit under it. And he dissipate the heat verywell. But it's a pain in the $%^ to install.

And to mini moof : Ivy Bridge sucks. More heat, more price, same performance.

Take the Sabertooth. Take an i7 2600k if you really need it. Even myself, which does prolly more photoshop/videoediting/3Drendering than anybody here, i just took the i5 2500k.

Btw, For your information, the i5 2500k clocked to the max is better than i7 2600k clocked to the max in some situtations. As the i7 can't reach that high frequencies that i5 can. Therefore, just buy the i5.

In conclusion, take The i7 only if you got the money.

It all depends on the person and the budget if you have the money you will want to go for intel and nvidia,
But if u dont then amd can still get you very good results for overclocking.
Example of this:
Your cpu the i5 2600k is 199.99$:
Intel i5 2600k
While the amd 8150 FX Black Edition 8 core processor:
179.99$:
Amd 8150 FX Black Edition

So the truth is if you have a budget and you have good cooling you would want to go with amd,
But if u have the money then you should want to got with intel and nvidia.

The amd 8150 FX Black Edition = Bulldozer Chip holds the world record for overclocks 8.7ghz+
So amd is amazing for overclocking if your someone that wants to overclock but remember in order to get to frequencies of 8.4 you need liquid nitrogen or else you will only get it to around 4.8ghz or around there keeping it at a good temperature.

KillZode wrote:

Paradoxxx_ wrote:

p0kelotsmot wrote:Im staying with AMD
you guys think that haveing the most exspensive crap is best?
my $800 system Is almost the same as my $2200 system
but more cores is better dont get me wrong and haveing a good intergrated sound card works wonders,but hey every one has their own opinion

I wonder how you're still able to say that AMD , whichever one, is as good as intel of the same category.

Exemple : my i5 2500k stock is better than latest 6Core from AMD. And with a slightly boost @ 4.00Ghz it blows AMD Octocores series. So I let you imagine how powerfull it is when it's clocked @ 4.8Ghz or 5Ghz like it is on my Comp.

Actually, @ 4.8Ghz, it beats hands down Last intel 1366 990x even overclocked. SandyBridges are beasts.

And which ever CPU u get, you'll have to buy another CPU Cooler. I personnaly have the Scythe Ninja 3. It's a good one and let even RAMs with HUUUUUGE dissipator (who said Gskill Ripsjawx? ) fit under it. And he dissipate the heat verywell. But it's a pain in the $%^ to install.

And to mini moof : Ivy Bridge sucks. More heat, more price, same performance.

Take the Sabertooth. Take an i7 2600k if you really need it. Even myself, which does prolly more photoshop/videoediting/3Drendering than anybody here, i just took the i5 2500k.

Btw, For your information, the i5 2500k clocked to the max is better than i7 2600k clocked to the max in some situtations. As the i7 can't reach that high frequencies that i5 can. Therefore, just buy the i5.

In conclusion, take The i7 only if you got the money.

It all depends on the person and the budget if you have the money you will want to go for intel and nvidia,
But if u dont then amd can still get you very good results for overclocking.
Example of this:
Your cpu the i5 2600k is 199.99$:
Intel i5 2600k
While the amd 8150 FX Black Edition 8 core processor:
179.99$:
Amd 8150 FX Black Edition

So the truth is if you have a budget and you have good cooling you would want to go with amd,
But if u have the money then you should want to got with intel and nvidia.

The amd 8150 FX Black Edition = Bulldozer Chip holds the world record for overclocks 8.7ghz+
So amd is amazing for overclocking if your someone that wants to overclock but remember in order to get to frequencies of 8.4 you need liquid nitrogen or else you will only get it to around 4.8ghz or around there keeping it at a good temperature.

Yea, but still, AMD 8150 Fx @ 4.8Ghz < Intel i5 @4.8Ghz. And by far.

Just buy a i7 6core 3.8 you can over clock it to 4.8. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819116491

[Pro-C|ub]KILLDEATH wrote:Just buy a i7 6core 3.8 you can over clock it to 4.8. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819116491

Yeeeeh. OFC. 1000$ for a CPU.

That's cheap

[Pro-C|ub]KILLDEATH wrote:That's cheap

O.O

[Pro-C|ub]KILLDEATH wrote:That's cheap

Hes Right

Its all about marketing.why spend $2500 for Best intel cpu and MB
Its like once you get past a certain pc speed any thing higher is just a waste.
you're not going to get better graphics,your game isnt going to load any faster than it already dose,your aimbot ain't going to be more accurate/faster.
Be like peter and go spend $1500 on 2 gpu's Its bragging rights I guess because nobuddy realy gives a fudge on how beast your pc is.
My 3d rendering score is like z0mg numbers! but my game is glitched from over clocking how do i fex?

You dont need 2x7970s either or 2x680,

Two 7870 ghz edition OC Sapphire Is Way better then 1 680 or 1 7970
And you will save money that is all you need to play games on ultra with alot of fps anything past that is a waste of money I would say,
and if your not satisfied you could always do 3-way crossfire.

[Pro-C|ub]KILLDEATH wrote:Just buy a i7 6core 3.8 you can over clock it to 4.8. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819116491

You would not want to clock that cpu to 4.8,
I would say max of 4.2 to stay durable think about how much your spending there,

If somone works for 10$ an hour it would take them 100 hours to make 1000$.


You would want something like that to last a long time because of how much it is worth.

why buy a cheap one that will do for now and have to be updated when the newest game is released why not spend big now and not for a very long time

[Pro-C|uB] Mini-moof wrote:why buy a cheap one that will do for now and have to be updated when the newest game is released why not spend big now and not for a very long time

Then take an i3 with any z77 MB.

KillZode wrote:
One 7870 ghz edition OC Sapphire Is Way better then 1 680 or 1 7970
.

Wrong. But it's away cheaper. But any 7870s editions won't never beat a 680 nor a 7970. It's just common sense plus benches.

http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/high_end_gpus.html

Paradoxxx_ wrote:

KillZode wrote:
2 7870 ghz edition OC Sapphire Is Way better then 1 680 or 1 7970
.

Wrong. But it's away cheaper. But any 7870s editions won't never beat a 680 nor a 7970. It's just common sense plus benches.

http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/high_end_gpus.html

I meant 2

KillZode wrote:

Paradoxxx_ wrote:

KillZode wrote:
2 7870 ghz edition OC Sapphire Is Way better then 1 680 or 1 7970
.

Wrong. But it's away cheaper. But any 7870s editions won't never beat a 680 nor a 7970. It's just common sense plus benches.

http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/high_end_gpus.html

I meant 2

Oh yeah, missed that part.

But now GTX660 or 7950.

Here 289€ for a 7950. and 299€ for a GTX660. and the perfoamcen charts says that the 7950 is better. Which is my next GPU.

http://www.pown.it/2704

p0kelotsmot wrote:http://www.pown.it/2704

Lol wtf

p0kelotsmot wrote:http://www.pown.it/2704

uhhh...... ok.... :S